We now define the random variable \(\bar{X}\) as the mean number of heads from flipping \(n\) fair coins.
This is computed by dividing the number of heads by \(n\). The possible values of \(\bar{X}\) will lie between 0 and 1.
2025
We now define the random variable \(\bar{X}\) as the mean number of heads from flipping \(n\) fair coins.
This is computed by dividing the number of heads by \(n\). The possible values of \(\bar{X}\) will lie between 0 and 1.
Flip1 | \(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|---|
H | 1.00 | 0.5 |
T | 0.00 | 0.5 |
\(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|
0.00 | 0.5 |
1.00 | 0.5 |
Flip1 | Flip2 | \(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|---|---|
H | H | 1.00 | 0.25 |
H | T | 0.50 | 0.25 |
T | H | 0.50 | 0.25 |
T | T | 0.00 | 0.25 |
\(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|
0.00 | 0.25 |
0.50 | 0.50 |
1.00 | 0.25 |
Flip1 | Flip2 | Flip3 | \(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
H | H | H | 1.00 | 0.125 |
H | H | T | 0.67 | 0.125 |
H | T | H | 0.67 | 0.125 |
H | T | T | 0.33 | 0.125 |
T | H | H | 0.67 | 0.125 |
T | H | T | 0.33 | 0.125 |
T | T | H | 0.33 | 0.125 |
T | T | T | 0.00 | 0.125 |
\(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|
0.00 | 0.125 |
0.33 | 0.375 |
0.67 | 0.375 |
1.00 | 0.125 |
Flip1 | Flip2 | … | Flip100 | \(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(2^100 combinations omitted) |
\(\bar{X}\) | \(P(\bar{X})\) |
---|---|
0.00 to 1.00 | Approximates a normal distribution centered at 0.50 |
We defined \(\bar{X}\) as the mean number of heads in a sequence of fair coin flips.
For small \(n\), \(\bar{X}\) had only a few possible values and did not have a bell-shaped distribution.
As \(n\) increased, the distribution of \(\bar{X}\) became increasingly bell-shaped and looked increasingly continuous.
This gradual emergence of a bell shape — even though individual outcomes are binary — is a demonstration of the Central Limit Theorem.